Friday, September 18, 2009

Frontier Justice

This story caught my eye today, and really made me think. A judge legally taking sports away from a star athlete (and teenager) is quite an act, really -- one which seems unprecedented to me.

My first reaction was that it was over-the-line, not because the crime he committed wasn't bad enough -- it was -- but because sports is usually viewed as a positive in the lives of young men (especially ones who grow up in ghettoes). With his crime, the kid had already lost his chances for scholarships with countless colleges. Taking this away seemed to me to be counter-intuitive: Why take away the one thing which could allow this young man to truly improve his circumstances?

But then, upon re-examination, I relized the genius behind the decision. See, athletes are forgiven for all manners of transgressions, from tiny to immense -- all because they are athletes. So, while taking away this young man's greatest lifeline may deprove him of untold money, fame, and opportunity, this also takes away his get-out-of-jail-free card. It very well may be the one thing which forces this guy to actually become a better person.

Think about it: Michael Vick is back making millions after a jail sentence. His crimes may make millions hate him, but it won't stop him from making lots of money or recieving the love and adoration of millions more. Does he ever really have to become a better person, or just act like he has. This decision, however, will force the young man to learn to survive in society without the crutch of sports to aid him. Any future transgressions will not be forgiven so easily. Then again, if he falls into a life of crime or squalor, folks will say this judge robbed him of his chance at escape by taking away the one thing at which he could excel.

All things considered, I like this decision, but I would also allow for a review of the terms after a year or two -- if he's managed to get a job, or enroll in school, and has done well for himself, I would be open to allowing back into sports. Otherwise -- if he improves, but isn't allowed to play sports until he's 24 -- one could argue his potential career will be lost over one incident, with no regard given to how he's rehabilitated himself.

Either way, this makes for a fascinating test-case, a social experiment with a real life in the balance. I suppose the hypothesis behind it would be to discover whether the world may lose a great athlete to gain a good person. That's a pretty fair trade, if you ask me.

Rock You Like A Hurricane

No, as much as I would like to devote a blog post to The Scorpions, this one is about a whole other kind of powerful force, namely, The U. My favorite college football team, the University of Miami Hurricanes, have been laying dormant for the past several seasons, putting up fair 7-6 type seasons which would be fine for some teams -- like my second favorite college football team, the Stanford Cardinal. But wins in the Emerald Bowl or Humanitarian Bowl aren't sufficient for fans of a school like Miami, where nothing less than competing for a national title is acceptable.

When the schedule for this season came out, it appeared the Canes were headed for a similiarly mediocre fate -- they faced arch-rival #20 Florida State to open things up on Labor Day, followed by tough matchups at home vs. #14 Georgia Tech, on the road at #7 Virginia Tech, and home vs. #3 Oklahoma. Despite the improvements to the program under coach (and alum) Randy Shannon, the Canes did not appear ready for four tough tests in a row to start the season. I told the best Cane fan I know, my buddy Josh, that I'd be happy with a 2-2 start. He concurred. Neither of us understood why Coach Shannon turned down the reported contract extension he received in the off-season with such a tough schedule to start, and some claiming he was already on the hot seat. I also found it hard to believe some of his staements about true Sophomore Jacory Harris -- namely, that he would go down in Cane history with championship QB's and legendary leaders like Ken Dorsey and Bernie Kosar.

Now, I understand. Now, I believe. Jacory Harris looks like a born-leader and potential Heisman Trophy candidate. And suddenly, 2-2 doesn't sound so acceptable anymore.

The Canes are 2-0 after escaping Tallahassee with a win (as if simply escaping Tallahassee wasn't good enough in itself), and beating up on previous Cane-killers Georgia Tech (Tech ruined the Canes shot at an ACC title last year, and also 3 years ago). Now, they face their toughest test yet -- going into Blacksburg to face VaTech. But despite the odds being stacked against them, the Canes have two large factors falling in their favor: 1) For the second striaght week, they have a week and a half to prepare for a big conference matchup, while their opponent has just a week, and 2) Oklahoma's Heisman-winning QB, Sam Bradford, may be out for their matchup.

So, in honor of their hot start, here is a list of the best Canes currently in the NFL. Enjoy.

Tuesday, August 25, 2009

Not About Baseball



Sometimes, especially on days like these, I wonder why I'm a sports fan. Last night, I knew better than to watch my baseball team, the Pathetic Fucking Bastards Giants, play the Rockies. Or so I thought.

After a surprisingly feel-good 2009 for the first 4 months or so, the Giants have been getting on my nerves. First, their inability to put togther offense of any kind has worn on me throughout the year -- there are only so many times you can see your favorite pitchers leave it all on the mound while dominating their opponent only to settle for a no decision (or worse, a loss) before it starts to eat away at your soul. After this season, my soul is in worse shape than Michael Jackson's nose. (Too soon?) Secondly, this crucial flaw, which should have cost them their ability to compete for a playoff spot weeks, or even months ago, is only now coming home to roost in new and annoyingly inventive ways -- heading into the weekend in Colorado, they'd gone from leading the wild card chase for most of the year to trailing the red-hot Rockies.

Lastly, after taking the first game in Colorado, they laid a gigantic egg turd at the on-going nightmare that is Coors Field, losing the next two, and endangering themselves of falling out of the race with a loss on Monday to drop 3 of 4 and end up 4 games back of the streaking Rockies. What's more: They had Zito on the mound. And while Zito's been much better lately -- let's face it, as tough as it is for me to say, he's been downright good -- I didn't want to see him pitch with the season on the line.

So I didn't tape the game as I normally do. I didn't intend to watch it. But when I got home and my wife was taking a shower, I didn't think it would hurt to check in on the game. I was wrong.

The Giants were tied, 1-1, so I watched a bit. Soon, after watching their wretched excuse for an offense flail wildly at pitches everywhere but in the strike zone, I gave up on the game -- and the team. Even their best hitter, the Kung Fu Panda himself, Pablo Sandoval, was hurt and out of the game, so no reason to watch. I did, however, keep tabs on the score as I watched shows with my wife all night. 1-1 in the 6th inning turned into 1-1 in the 9th, then 12th, and finally 14th.

And then it happened. The Giants scored. Not once, or twice, but three freaking times! Suddenly, they had a chance. And, much more dangerously, had hope. Now SHAWSHANK REDEMPTION taught me that hope is a good thing, maybe the best of things, but I'm certain Stephen King never watched the Giants play (he is a Red Sox fan, after all). For Giants fans, hope is a four-letter word. Well, obviously, hope is a four-letter word for everybody, but it's the bad kind for Giants fans. We learned this in 1987 and '89. And '93 and '97. And again in 2000. And '02. And '03. And '04. Maybe in the 5 preceding years we forgot, but the bottom of the 14th provided an indelible reminder. Watching the Giants "relievers" walk 3 Rockies -- including the pitcher (with the bases loaded!) -- before giving up a back-breaking, soul-crushing walk-off grand slam, was like God whispering "Gotcha!" in our collective ear.

It was apinful loss, on a road trip full of them, for a franchise well-versed in them. But it was a little more even than that. It was a reminder that even the most surprising, joyous, and innocent hopes can be turned into something embarrassing and ugly. And while, I don't like to admit it, I feel like this love/hateafraid to love relationship I have with the Giants has spilled over into other aspects of my life. I have the same distrust about potentially positive developments, and the same general feeling of unease and impending doom in aspects of my personal life. My writing in particular. I have the same "Why can't I quit this?" reaction to every setback. The same "Why does God hate me so much he must tease me like this?" defeatism. The same "Trying is pointless" pessimism.

I can't say for sure the Giants did this to me. Maybe I was already this way. Maybe I'm so fucked up I unconsciously looked for a team which seemed cursed to fit the feeling I had for myself. But it's hard to believe that when taken in chronological context -- the Giants weren't really cursed when I started watching them. I'd beenb a fan for two years before the first cursed-like event happened (Candy Maldonado, a good right-fielder, losing Tony Pena's flyball in the lights for a triple, and then making a weak throw which allowed him to score the only run in a 1-0 debacle in St. Louis is the '87 playoffs). And it's really only been in the last 16 years -- at least 7 years into my fandom -- when the real karmic shit hit the fan: 103 wins falling short in '93 (the year before the wild card was instituted), two walk-off one-run losses in the '97 playoffs, Benny Agbayani's walk-ff HR in the 2000 playoffs, the big blown lead in the '02 world series, Jose Cruz's dropped fly in '03, Steve Finley's division-clinching walk-off grand slam in '04.

There's really no way I could've know what I was in for. That means fate chose me. Maybe that's why I seem to align myself with the disappointed, the disillusioned, the disenfranchised. Or at least why I think I do. But whether it's actually the case or not is moot. You are you you think you are. And, more and more, I think I'm a near-miss, a could've been, a contender who always falls short, someone who never seems to get (or make) the big break when they need it. Maybe it's my destiny, maybe it's just the shackles I've applied to myself. Maybe I watch way too much fucking sports, and it's poisoned my brain with well-worn cliches about winners and losers, and curses, and teams of destiny.

But the thing is, life really is just like baseball -- just when you're bitching and moaning about the latest loss, injury, or disappointment, there's another opportunity on the horizon. A new game, a new day, a new chance to do something which makes you (and everyone else) forget the skeletons in your closet. This season's not over, it just feels that way. There's always tomorrow -- a new chance to prove all those diappointments were just the appetizer for an epic meal of accomplishment, or another chance to fail in new and appalling ways. Probably the latter.

Tuesday, August 11, 2009

A Blog Post

Obviously, I haven't posted in while. I'm not sure exactly why. I guess I'm struggling to find things I feel need writing. Don't confuse that with having nothing to say. I actually have a lot to say -- it just all usually ends up being written in a script, or being told to my wife and/or friends, or lost to the revages of time because I don't feel it's important enough to write.

I think that might be the real problem actually -- the idea that something should be important if you're going to take the time out of your busy schedule to write something down. Especially if you highly doubt anyone will actually read it anyway. It shouldn't be that way. I want to write just for the sake of writing -- that's why I started this blog in the first place. But I've never been a journal type of guy -- I've never had a diary, or jotted down my feelings on legal pads at difficult times in my life.

I'm a writer, sure, it's become ingrained in my DNA. But the desire to entertain or inform is so great, I can't bring myself to write just because. I'll pour my feelings of frustration into a story. Hell, I even used to write a poem here and there back in touchy-feely college days, though I feel distinct embarrassment at revealing that. I've written about baseball for this blog, about football for this one (which I plan to return to here in a couple of weeks for the beginning of the NFL season), and reviewed movies and TV shows for this here blog, but I don't write just for writing's sake.

That was the intent when I began this -- to write whatever popped into my head. But my internal editor seems incapable of allowing that. There must be a reason, a goal. First, I found myself drifting into more and more entertainment reviews -- so I could be that site you went to in order to find out if that show/movie was worth checking out from someone (sort of) inside the entertainment industry. Then it was more sports -- I could be that blog you went to in order to read a snarky take on the sports world (god knows there aren't enough blogs doing that!). But soon it became apparent to me that my writing was totally uninspired and redundant to so many things already available on the web. I wanted to quit, but that seemed even more cliche than what I was already doing.

The only obvious choice is to write about something nobody else writes about -- namely myself. And while lots of other bloggers write about their lives, none actually write about mine, so it would be unique. Well, unique-ish. But I just don't find my life to be all that interesting. Maybe nobody really does. But a hell of a lot of people spend a lot of time on their blogs pretending they do. I just can't bring myself to write something I doubt anyone finds entertaining. Sure, nobody's probably reading anyway, so who could be bored? But that's not the point. The point is, I've been trained through screenwriting to believe writing should entertain. Boring = death. So if my life is boring, it's the last thing I should write about.

Another factor is timing. If I had started the blog when I was taking lots of meetings around town pitching scripts it could've been good -- the world of pitching movie ideas in Hollywood from the inside. Sure, I couldn't have revealed too many juicy details without risking my livelihood, but it could've been good. The same could be said if I started the blog right after my writing partner and I sold our pitch, THE DISCIPLES OF DARRYL to Intrepid Pictures and began the development process. I've written about it a bit here, and again the caveat regarding my career security woul've still applied, but keeping a running diary of my experiences would've been interesting. Instead, I started the blog right as screenwriting -- or at least the business of screenwriting -- began to take a back seat in my life.

But now I'm writing a new screenplay -- one I'm exceptionally excited about -- and writing as much as I have in a long time. The ideas are flowing, and while 99% of the best stuff will probably find it's way into my script, I feel like they're might even be enough to carry over to here. Of course, I'll have to wedge it in between the screenwriting, the football writing, the (almost) full-time job, and the time spent with my wife, but maybe there's a small crack in there I can exploit. No promises, but I want to continue writing here -- even if it's navel-gazing minutia like, Oh I don't know, this post right here as a matter of fact. I don't know why I feel the need to make this declaration. I doubt anyone's reading, so maybe I'm just making it to myself. I just think this forum is too valuable, too open, too flexible, too much fun (potentially) to waste.

I'd liek to write reviews of things I've seen recently -- FUNNY PEOPLE (they weren't), BRUNO, PUBLIC ENEMIES, reality TV, something -- but when I do that, I feel like it has to be, you know, actually good. When I write about whatever stupid thing I'm thinking/doing, it can be crap -- like this -- and still not be a failure. It's sort of like that first lesson every writer has to learn: If there's something on the page, then it's not a failure. Making it good? That's the second step.

Friday, July 17, 2009

The 2nd Half



The Giants second half began with a tough loss -- 2-1 in 14 innings at Pittsburgh, where the Giants have struggled mightily in recent years. Lincecum was dominant, but it wasn't enough, as stale OF prospect named Garrett Jones hit 2 homers to beat the punchless Giants, who scored just one run and needed an error just to get that.

Will this great pitching, no hitting continue? Will it spur Sabean to make a desperate play for veteran bats? Is this the beginning of the end, or the end of the beginning? Or is it the middle of the end? Or the beginning of the middle of the end? The end of the middle? Only time will tell.

Pic courtesy of FriscoJoe over at McCovey Chronicles.

Thursday, May 21, 2009

Giants = Bad: Padres 3, Giants 2


'Nuff said.

Are We Having Fun Yet?: Padres 2, Giants 1

Not much to write about this one. Again, the Giants couldn't score (for the second straight night their one run was a pathetic excuse for one which came on an out and nearly a double-play). Again, they left a man at 3rd with one out to cost them the run which could've sent the game into extra innings. Again, they wasted a great pitching performance -- though for a welcome change it came from Jonathan Sanchez, who'd been struggling. Again, the Giants lost 2-1. Again, they lost at San Diego -- 0-5 to start the year.

The Giants fell below .500 for the first time since April, and things are looking pretty bleak from the offensive side. They can hit with no one on, but they can't get a big hit to drive in a run to save their lives, and the panic at the plate in those situations is palpable. The panic in the manager's office is pretty obvious too, judging from Bruce Bochy's comments on the feeble offense on Tuesday, and by the fact he wrote out a lineup for Wednesday with Aaron Rowand leading off. That might have been the one bright spot -- Rowand had 3 hits.

TOMORROW: Tim Lincecum loses 2-1 to ex-Giants Kevin Correia as the Giants set a major league record by stranding runners at 3rd with less than 2 out in every inning.

Wednesday, May 20, 2009

Spotted at Runyon Canyon...


Yesterday walking the canyon, I passed Matthew Perry, looking very gray, sporting a goatee and listening to his iPod. It's amazing to see certain stars out and about in Hollywood due to how gray their hair is. You don't realize they always have their hair colored before appearing in movies, TV, or even talk shows, so you get this idea of them being younger than they are. This is because once people find out you're old, you become less of a commodity in show business. So a few stars -- Ben Stiller comes to mind -- walk around LA with very grey hair, but never have even one grey hair in any of their movies. Matthew Perry is apparently a member of this group.

So is Nick Cage, but I think with him it has more to do with bad hair than grey hair. That, or an obsession to come up with the most insane hairdo's imaginable. This is my personal favorite:

cage my hair is a bird Pictures, Images and Photos

Tuesday, May 19, 2009

YOUR San Francisco Giants: Padres 2, Giants 1

This is the Giants -- like it or not. They will waste leadoff doubles with alarming consistency. They will leave men on 3rd with less than 2 out. They will threaten to score over and over, and fail over and over, just to lose by 1 run. And, it appears, they will do it most of all while Barry Zito is on mound -- the better his performance, the more frustratingly ineffective their offensive attack will be. This was again the case Tuesday night as the Giants wasted yet another impressive outing by the resurgent Zito, who had to realize his fate after just 2 innings.

In each of the first 2 innings, the Giants had their leadoff man reach 2nd base with nobody out (and in each case, in the person of one of their fastest baserunners -- Eugenio Velez and Randy Winn, respectively), but failed to even advance them as far as 3rd. In the meantime, Zito allowed nothing 2 runs, each coming on solo HR's (both with 2 out to make it even more frustrating). other than that, Zito was great, going the route, as he watched the Giants squander yet another man-on-2nd-no-out situation and other potential rallies. In all, they went 0-12 with RISP, 0-11 in the first 4 innings alone.

The biggest villain on offense had to be Rich Aurilia, who looks about as done as you can look. Aurilia flailed in attempts to advance a runner from 2nd, and also to drive one in from 3rd with one out, striking out both times. Aurilia can only play 1B at this point in his career, and he can't hit, so I'm not sure what role there is unless they come up with a new one called D.S: Designated Strikeout. If Jesus Guzman, the 1B prospect tearing it up at AAA, isn't called up soon, Aurilia could burn through all the good will he's earned with fans (including this one), and the Giants may end up D.H.-ing a pitcher during interleague play, Rays-style.

TOMORROW: Sachez v. Gaudin.

Monday, May 18, 2009

Balks, Walks, Cain Rocks: Giants 2, Mets 0

Matt Cain for the block, indeed. Cain did what he does -- fall behind batters, walk guys, run up his pitch count, then make great pitches to get out of seemingly impossible jams. Also, in his bag of tricks: Get inadequate run support, then take matters into his own hands, driving in a big run. The only aberration: Getting great bullpen work. Not so much from Bob Howry, who got through the 7th, but walked Luis Castillo to open the 8th -- an unforgivable sin in a 2-run game -- but definitely from Jeremy Affeldt, who got out of a big time jam in the 8th (his second escape act of the series) and Brian Wilson, who at least partially redeemed himself for two losses in the series, by saving it with a 1-2-3 9th.

The Giants somehow kept the Mets off the board despite several promising rallies -- usually started by walks, most notably Cain three free passes to open the 2nd -- using clutch pitching and good D (primarily Travis Ishikawa's 3-2-3 DP on a scorched line drive one-hopper). The Giants offense scratched out their 2 cheapie runs with the help of 3 balks by the very un-steady Mets starter Mike Pelfrey, and a clutch hit by Cain.

Of course, you might not have realized any of this by watching the game on ESPN's Sunday Night Baseball as color commentators Steve Phillips and Joe Morgan did nothing by drone on about the Mets and their leadership situation, completely ignoring the game being played before them. Something else you might have missed: The formerly hard-luck Cain is now 4-1 with a 2.65 ERA.

TOMORROW: Off-day Monday, Tuesday, the Giants travel down to San Diego for a threesome with the Padres (not as sexy as it sounds), with Barry Zito taking on Chris Young in the opener.

Saturday, May 16, 2009

This Is Not A Recording: Mets 9, Giants 6

More of the same for the Giants, who basically took the worst of the first two games of the season and combined them in Game 3 -- poor starting pitching over come by good offense, followed by leaving in the starter too long, and bad relief pitching -- especially in the 9th -- plus an extra helping of bonehead managing to lose it.

This time it was the Unit getting the Giants in an early hole, 3-0 to Johan Santana. That would be enough most days, but the Giants fought back to tie it at 3-3. Johnson and the bullpen immediately gave it all back and more, allowing 4 runs in the top of the next inning. Down to Santana again, the Giants looked like toast. Again. But they came back. Again.

The Giants scored 3 to get within 7-6, and got the tying run on base to lead off the 8th. But their rally died when they made an out on the bases (their 3rd of the day) on a busted hit-and-run, which was just a terrible idea by Bochy. It was a 3-2 count, but Travis Ishikawa was at the plate -- a big-time strikeout threat -- and the not-too-speedy Juan Uribe was on base. After the Giants gave up their requisite 2 runs in the 9th, the game was over.

Unfortunately, his is becoming the status quo for the Giants -- doing just enough to give yourself a chance, but not enough to win. It was less than 100 hours ago, they were 4 games over .500, hadn't lost any of their last 9 series, and were going for the sweep against the poor, pathetic Nats to go 5 under for the first time since 1994. Now they are 18-18 and have to avoid their own sweep at the hands of the mighty Mets, who's middle of the order has feasted on Giants pitching. It's not just them, either: The Nats scored a lot of runs, even in their losses (7 each), so it's been all homestand so far. Suddenly, it's the offense which has become their only hope. Strange days, indeed.

TOMORROW: Matt Cain for the block.

...And That's When Depression Set In: Mets 8, Giants 6

So many things went wrong for the Giants on Friday night -- starting pitching, bullpen, defense, clutch hitting, managing, luck -- you could write a long, detailed essay on the multi-faceted failure. But that could take years and cost millions of lives. In my opinion, this game came down to one boneheaded decision by Bruce Bochy. And now, because of it, the Giants have a 3-game losing streak, and are back to letting the Dodgers (now 6 games up) run away with the division.

It was the 6th inning, and the Giants looked to have the game well in hand. It was 5-1, and Lincecum had struck out the side the previous inning. But his fastball velocity was a bit down, and he was leaning heavily on his changeup. In the top of the 6th, as his pitch count rose over 100, he allowed 2 runs, closing the gab to 5-3. It was pretty clear he was done. Sure, if the Giants went -2-3, and his spot didn't come up, maybe you could send him out until a baserunner got on, and hope he had a quick inning. Only the Giants didn't go 1-2-3, and Lincecum's spot did come up -- with a man on 2nd base. An insurance run. An engraved invitation to pinch-hit. Somewhere deep in the recesses of Bruce Bochy's brain he thought"Pinch hit? But that's just what they're expecting me to do."

Bochy let Lincecum hit, and briefly looked smart, as Lincecum singled in the runner. That positivity didn't last long. In the top of the 7th, Lincecum allowed a hit and a walk, and was pulled from the game without recording another out. Merkin Valdez also faced two hitters, and failed to record an out -- a walk to Gary Sheffield, and a 3-run double by David Wright to tie the game, 6-6. Jeremy Affeldt came in and did a great job of holding the score right there by striking out the side after Wright stole 3rd with nobody out, but it was useless -- the Giants were going to do whatever it took to lose this game.

They proved that yet again when they stranded Randy Winn at 3rd with 1 out in the bottom of the 8th, although that had as much to do with bad luck (Winn's ball missed being a HR by a foot, and with 2 outs, Rich Aurilia scorched a liner that Alex Cora stabbed at SS) as it did poor hitting (Aaron Rowand continued his LVP-caliber season by grounding weakly to 3rd with 1 out).

The Mets eventually won by beating Brian Wilson in the 9th inning of a tie game (for the second straight night), but the dye was cast when Bochy (who would later be ejected) left a spent Lincecum in, needlessly risking an insurance run, the lead, and most importantly, Lincecum's arm, by overworking him on a night what he was clearly not his best, after a tough inning. I don't care how tired the bullpen was, especially since Affeldt, their best set-up man, went 2 innings anyway. Boo Bochy. Boo.

TOMORROW: The Big Unit takes the hill in a semi-nationally televised game, trying end the the Giants 3-game losing streak, trying to keep alive his streak of pitching well at home, and trying to help continue the Giants streak of not losing series by giving them a chance to split on Sunday. That's a lot of streaks. Unfortunately, their all going up against Johan Santana, quite possibly the best pitcher in baseball.

Thursday, May 14, 2009

The Blahs: Mets 7, Giants 4

The Giants had been playing well recently, but their series winning streak seemed more like an oddity than a barometer of their strength as a team. They've been a bit lucky play the Nats, and the Dodgers right after they lost Manny. Sure, they were playing well, but so many of those wins were predicated on infield hits and 1-run victories. That trend was bound to turn. A lull in momentum is inevitable in baseball no matter how good you are. When they lost to the Nats on the eve of the Mets visit for a 4-game series, I wondered if this might be the time. Tonight did nothing to quell those fears.

The Giants scored 2 runs in the 8th, tying the game with an improbable comeback. Well, improbable besides the fact that the "rally" was started by an infield hit (Fred Lewis, leading off the inning), and ended with an infield hit (Edgar Renteria drove in the tying run, but appeared to injure his hammy legging out the hit*). But Brian Wilson continued to struggle in non-save opportunities, surrendering 3 runs to Mets in the 9th, allowing them to ice the game.

TOMORROW: The Giants need a win if they plan to at least split this series with New York -- remember, Johan Santana is scheduled to pitch over the weekend. The Good News: The Giants have ace Tim Lincecum taking the hill tomorrow. The Bad News: They'll face Livan Hernandez. I know, Livo is not so good anymore, and comes in with a 5+ ERA, but he's exactly the kind of pitcher who dominates the Giants, and it's the kind of thing that would drive me up the wall. So it's bound to happen.

* The way he left the field, I could easily see Renteria going on the disabled list, so you better get used to Juan Uribe at SS for while.

Sabean FTL: Nationals 6, Giants 3

I'm pinning today's Giants loss squarely on Brian Sabean. He's the one who gave away Shairon Martis, the rookie who's gone 5-0 to start the season while pitching for a team with only 11 wins, and who held the Giants to 2 hits to keep them from sweeping the Nats. It was 2006 when Sabean traded Martis, fresh off a no-hitter in the WBC that Spring, for crusty vet Mike Stanton in a foolish attempt to make a stretch run. The Giants were barely at .500 and were several pieces away from serious contention, but Sabean made a Sabeanic move by trading the future for a futile shot at the present.

Today, the rookie, pitching for the major-league minimum, beat one the highest paid starters in baseball, Barry Zito. And that's saying something these days. Again, Zito pitched well -- though his line is great because he tired in the 7th, and had some his runners score after he left -- but he wasn't as good as Martis. The Giants could get the sweep, but took the series to keep their streak alive, and prepare for a weekend series against the Mets -- including two nationally-televised games (FOX Saturday, ESPN Sunday).

TOMORROW: Jonathan Sanchez tries to find his groove as he takes on John Maine.

Tuesday, May 12, 2009

Riches to Rags to Riches: Giants 9, Nationals 7


The Giants turned their worst loss of the season into their best win with one mighty swing of Pablo Sandoval's bat. The Kung Fu Panda's 3-run bolt of a HR off reformed Dodger Joe Beimel gave the Giants a stirring come-from-behind win despite blowing 4 run 7th inning lead to the worst team in baseball and then trailing with 2 outs and nobody on in the 9th.

It was the Giants first real comeback win of the year, and puts them a season-high 4 games over .500, and guarantees them yet another series win. In the last 9 series including this one, they are now 7-0-2, both those ties coming on the road after losing the series opener. It was also the second game in a row, the Giants have allowed 7 runs (albeit against one of the best offensive teams in the NL so far), yet still scored enough to win it with their hitting (albeit against one of the worst pitching staffs in the NL so far). Oh yeah, and Pablo's HR kep the Giants undefeated when scoring first (14-0).

The Giants comeback followed what could have been a crushing rally by the Nationals, who scored 3 runs each in the 7th and 8th to erase a 5-1 lead and steal a win away from Matt Cain. Cain cruised through the first 6 innings, allowing just what should have been an unearned run (Adam Dunn's double should've been caught by Nate Schierholtz, who misjudged it and saw it clank off his wrist), but ran into trouble in the 7th. With 1 out and none on, and Cain on a pitch count which might allow him to finsih the game, Alex Cintron got his first hit of the year. Cristian Guzman followed with another hit before Nick Johnson crushed a good pitch from Cain (knee-high, outer third) for an opposite-field HR -- his first hit ever off Cain.

Right then, you knew it wouldn't be easy.It didn't take long for that to prove out. Cain stayed in to retire Ryan Zimmerman (who had 2 hits to extend his hitting streak to 30) and Adam Dunn to end the inning, but left after 7, having thrown just 100 pitches (not that much for Cain). The combo of Howry (mostly) and Affeldt (just a little) blew the lead by allowing 3 runs (albeit on some pretty weak contact) and the Giants suddenly trailed 7-5. A sure victory for Cain was gone, and the game seemed lost -- even when Bengie Molina led off the next inning with a HR.

I figured the Giants would lose by one, just to make it that much more frustrating. But with 2 out and none on in the 9th, Emmanuel Burris singled, and after being wild-pitched to 2nd, Edgar Renteria drew a crucial walk in a great at bat plate appearance. That set the stage for Sandoval, whose dramatics had to be all that much sweeter to him following an embarrassing play a few innings earlier when he stumbled trying to leg out a triple and took and header in the basepath.

TOMORROW: Barry Zito takes the mound against ex-Giants farmhand, 4-0 rookie Shairon Martis (who was criminally given awaty by Brian Sabean in the Mike Stanton robbery trade) as the Giants go for the sweep of the Nationals. Will Zito continue his recent run of unexpected mastery, or will he run out of smoke and/or mirrors?

Monday, May 11, 2009

Runs!: Giants 11, Nationals 7


I guess the Nats pathetic pitching is worse than the Giant pathetic offense. At least for one game, there's no other explanation for what happened in the opener of the 3-game set at Mays Field. Not only did the Giants score 11 runs, but at one point the team which draws less walks than any team around actually drew 5 in a row -- the last 3 driving in runs. And that came after 2 runs scored when LF Josh Willingham whiffed on a can of corn off the bat of Fred Lewis in one of the most embarrassing efforts you'll see in the outfield. They also got clutch hits, including one from a reliever. So, there's that.

The only downside of the long inning was that The Unit seemed to stiffen up. Up to that point, Johnson had allowed 2 runs (both on solo HR's) through 5 innings, striking out 9 and not walking anybody. Afterwards, he couldn't record another out, going HR, single, wild pitch, double before being pulled. He won -- #298 lifetime -- kept his streak of dominant pitching (yes, he allowed 4 runs in 5 innings, but 9 K's/0 BB's is dominant) at home --to off-set his terrible pitching on the road. It also kept alive the possibility of The Unit going for win #300 at Seattle, which would be pretty damn cool. For that to happen, he'll have to beat Johan Santana and the Mets this weekend, so I wouldn't hold my breath. On the other hand, it is at home.

The bullpen made it interesting in the 9th, and Brian Wilson had to come in for the save after pitching 2 innings yesterday in LA, but he only had to throw 3 pitches -- Strike 1, Strike 2, and Strike 3 to Willingham. Wilson seemed a little more deliberate in doing his post-game crossed-arm salute to the sky, possibly due to the Casey Blake incident yesterday.

Don't look now, but the Giants have crept to 3 games over .500, and are just 4 games behind the Dodgers, and just a half-game behind Cincy for the NL Wild Card lead.

TOMORROW: Matt Cain takes his fast start (3-1, 2.61) to the mound against Nats rookie Jordan Zimmermann, who has a very nice K/BB rate (18/6), but has given up a lot of hits (26) and HR's (5) so far (23 innings), resulting in a 5.48 ERA.

Sunday, May 10, 2009

O.M.G.: Giants 7, Dodgers 5


The Giants kept a streak alive by going against a trend. They won another series -- extending their streak of non-losing series to eight -- by winning a game in which they didn't score first. With the victory they're now only 3-14 when failing to score first. They did, however, continue a much happier trend -- scoring a lot of runs (for them) in the final games of series. On this road trip, they put 6 on getaway day in Chicago when needing a win Denver in the same situation, and 7 on getaway day in LA to take this series.

More than that, they won a game when several important factors broke against them -- Tim Lincecum wasn't as sharp as usual (though he still had great numbers everywhere but the "Runs" column), they continued to flail with men in scoring position (including two particularly poor AB's from Pablo Sandoval, who swung at first-pitch low-and-away sinkers to ground out with ducks on the pond), Juan Pierre could do no wrong, and Brian Wilson blew a save.

They won a game they needed to be able to feel like they're still in the race -- 4.5 out, but 2 over .500 -- even though it took 13 innings, they were on the road, and had every reason to believe they should lose. They scored in the 12th and 13th innings just when you might expect them to pack it in, After Wilson blew the save in the 12th, he came back to get the Dodgers 1-2-3 in the 13th, but that didn't stop him from fuming afterwards over mocking from Casey Blake, who took him deep to tie the game. Twitter, mohawks, mocking -- Brian Wilson is a walking controversy.

TOMORROW: The Giants come home to play the resurgent Nats, as The Unit takes on Daniel Cabrera at Mays Field.

Saturday, May 9, 2009

Well, So Much For That: Dodgers 8, Giants 0


No game in May really means anything, but when you're as desperate for competitive baseball as we Giants fans are, you'll take what you can get. So when circumstances put them in position to climb within a few games of the psychically damaged Dodgers and make a race out of the NL West, it took on playoff-like drama. (Not really, but you get the point.) So the way the Giants fell on their collective face on semi-national TV was pretty disappointing. Surprising it was not.

Again the Giants were shut down -- shut out as a matter of fact, by the legendary Eric Stultz -- and Jonathan Sanchez remained maddeningly inconsistent and wild. Sanchez didn't get any help from home plate ump Dan Iassogna, who squeezed him quite a bit, especially during LA's 3-run 3rd inning, or the Giants offense, but he was sub-par any way you look at it.

Again the Giants lost a game in which they failed to score first. They are now 2-14 those games, in stark contrast to their 13-0 record when scoring first. I think the key to that stat is the fact that scoring first guarantees you actually score. The stat could almost be amended to simply "When the Giants score first, they win."

The Good News: The Giants still have a chance to win yet another series, continue their impressive streak of non-losing series, and end a tough road trip with a winning record, and they sent out Tim Lincecum. If the hitters can scratch out a couple of runs against Jeff Weaver -- which will be a lot easier if Bruce Bochy will see fit to playing Bengie Molina and Pablo Sandoval at the same time -- they have a shot.

Feelin' Frisky: Giants 3, Dodgers 1

Since the Giants started 2-7, they've gone on a 13-6 run fueled by great starting pitching, a competent bullpen, and some of the ugliest offensive baseball you'll ever see. It was more of the same tonight, as the suddenly dominant Barry Zito did his thing against the Dodgers for the second time in a week and a half, and the Giants offense scratched out 3 runs to beat the previously 5-0 Chad Billingsley.

For the fourth straight time out, Zito held the opponent scoreless through the first 5 innings. For the first time in those starts he allowed a run before the 7th, and even then he came within inches -- as Fred Lewis allowed a 2-out RBI double by Casey Blake to tick off the edge of his glove. That tied the game at 1-1, and seemed to be yet another bad break for Zito, who seems to have inherited Matt Cain's poor luck from the last 2 seasons. But for once this season, Zito caught a little luck in the next half inning when the Giants scored 2 runs while he was still the pitcher of record.

So Zito got first first win of the year when Brian Wilson nailed down another 4-out save, in what seems to be a growing trend -- Bruce Bochy going to Wilson in the 8th when the right-handed set-up men (previously Howry, tonight Merkin Valdez) struggle to close out the inning in a tight game. Wilson was up to the pressure, and so were the Giants, an interesting turn in what has become a fascinating sequence of events over the last couple of days: First Manny's suspension, then the Dodgers blow a game they led 6-0 after 1 inning against Washington (the worst team in baseball) to snap their 13-0 start at home, and finally the Giants win in LA against the Dodgers ace in their toughest matchup of the series.

Suddenly, LA looks vulnerable, and the Giants look feisty. Of course, while the Dodgers may struggle to score without Manny, we know the Giants will struggle to score. But if the Giants win on Saturday, and head into Sunday going for a sweep behind Tim Lincecum to pull within 2.5 games, I'll be too drunk on optimism and momentum to listen to that kind of reason.

TOMORROW: The biggest game of the year so far (as if that meant anything) -- Jonathan Sanchez vs. Eric Stultz.

Thursday, May 7, 2009

...And The Trend Continues To Be Your Friend: Giants 8, Rockies 3

Another non-losing series (7 in a row). Another game where the Giants scored first and won (now 12-0). Another day bouncing between .500 and one game over (it always feels nicer one game over for some reason). Most importantly, it was another win for Matt Cain, who somehow allowed no runs despite walking 5, and the Giants, who head to LA for a showdown of sorts with the Manny-less Dodgers.

It didn't look good early as Giant-killer Jason Marquis, who dominated them in San Francisco last week, set the Giants down 1-2-3 with very little effort, and Cain followed that by walking the first two batters he faced, and falling behind the next, Todd Helton, 3-0. But Cain managed to entice Helton into a GIDP with a monumental 3-1 change-up, righted his ship, and ended up going 6 shutout innings. By that time, the Giants were up 5-0 -- mainly on the strength of 2 Bengie Molina HR's off Marquis, against whom he'd previously been 0 for 12 lifetime.

Cain had settled down to the point he might've been sent out there for the 7th, but after reaching on an error (a throw which actually hit him in the back) and having to run the bases a bit as the Giants tacked on another couple of runs, he was pinch-run for by Bruce Bochy. The pen handled it from there, and Giants continued their win-one-lose-one streak.

TOMORROW: The Dodger series just a lot more interesting today with the news about Manny's suspension, and the Giants coming in over .500. If the Dodgers win tonight, they'll still be undefeated at home and threatening to run away and hide in the NL West. If they lose, the Giants might catch them just as they cool off. Either way, there figures to be a gaping hole in the middle of that lineup. Hopefully, the resurgent Barry Zito can take advantage and set the tone for the series Friday night. Still, a win will be a tall task -- the Dodgers will throw staff ace, and newly-crowned Giant-killer, Chad Billingsley.

State of the Blog


I've been seriously considering quitting the daily baseball diary thing. Not just because I'm quitter -- though I am definitely that -- but also because my writing time (and free time in general) has become such a precious commodity. With a job, a wife, and a screenwriting career (such as it is), I have enough trouble squeezing in time to watch baseball, let alone write about it. I think that shows in my effort, as I often squeeze in a perfunctory post late at night, often thinking, "Oh yeah, I still have write something for the blog." That's never the right attitude to go into any creative endeavor.

I know from experience that my screenwriting is much better when I'm excited to start, when I carve out sections of my life in which to work. But that's the thing -- when it's good, it's not work, but play. Sure, as a professional, sometimes you have to force yourself to get into it with a "Time to make the donuts" kid of mentality. But more often than not, I catch myself working without realizing it -- thinking about ways to improve something while in the shower, or the car, or hiking. Hell, that's half the reason I hike every day -- the other half being to keep from being a pale fatass. That hasn't really happened with the stuff about baseball, and there are several possible reasons for this.

Reason #1 I've already mentioned -- free time. That has to come first, and with the caveat that in terms of priorities, writing about baseball on my blog falls pretty low. That leads to Reason #2: I hate not doing things well. If I'm going to undertake something, I want to be proud of the result. That's why I quit so many things -- I don't think I can do as well as I deem necessary. But neither of those reasons shoulder all the blame.

Enter Reason #3: Though I often dreamed of being a sportswriter when I was a kid, it's not really something I've taken to when given the opportunity. The occasional post about baseball allowed me the great opportunity to write for McCovey Chronicles for a couple of interim stints, and I enjoyed it, but by the end, I was ready to stop and never do it again. A few posts about football from time to time got me the opportunity to write a couple of weekly columns for Niners Nation and that was fun, but again, I was looking forward to the end of the season. I don't know if it has more to do with the responsibility of having to get it done, or the fact my mind is so used to running through character traits, arcs, and plot points that it's hard to train it to think up ideas about what to say about sports. But how can that be the case when I spend so much time thinking about sports?

Maybe because I've yet to learn a successful way to channel what I think about into the posts. For screenwriting, I'm constantly jotting down ideas, notes, capturing every possibility, choosing between them, then tweaking them over and over. For sportswriting I find a little time, write some stream of consciousness stuff and hit "Post". That's it. No plan of attack. No notes about how Travis Ishikawa needs to start swinging at some first pitches because pitchers are laying in fastballs and he's falling behind right away. Just throwing shit at the wall to see if it sticks. If you want to do something well, and you're not some kind of genius or savant, you have to put some time and effort in. I haven't done that. The question is, am I ready to? Which brings us to...

Reason #4: Along with the screenwriting, work, and personal life, I also like writing about other things: movie and TV reviews, a post about my life here and there, another Hollywood Horror Show column -- a haven't written one of those in months and I have several good stories just waiting around to be told. I don't want to be all-baseball-all-the-time all summer, ignoring summer movies and all the new TV shows I'd like to review ("Better Off Ted", "The Unusuals", "Southland", even the so-bad-it's-good-or-maybe it's-just-really-bad "Harper's Island"). No matter what I do, I'm definitely going to post more stuff about entertainment.

So, while I'd like to re-dedicate myself and put a little more thought and effort into my posts, I'm leaning heavily toward either giving it up entirely, or reducing it somehow. Of course, as I'm writing this, the story about Manny Ramirez being suspended 50 games is all over the internet/TV/radio and the Giants are beating the Rockies 5-0 behind an "effectively wild" Matt Cain and a power-binging Bengie Molina. So it looks like I picked the wrong week to stop sniffing glue.

Manny tested positive for a banned substance, reportedly a fertility drug. He claims it was prescribed by a doctor for a health issue, which seems curious since I haven't read anything about Ramirez trying to get pregnant. You'd think he'd at least wait until the off-season to try and get knocked up. then again, the way he plays LF, carrying a baby around in his womb probably wouldn't make much of a difference.

This is, of course, a very interesting -- and for a Giants fan, entertaining -- story which I'd like to explore a bit over the coming hours/days/weeks. And the timing of the whole thing -- the day before the 2nd place Giants travel to LA to play the 1st place Dodgers, who are undefeated at home and threatening to run away with the division -- makes it all the more intriguing. I can't just quit now, can I?

Just when I think I'm out, they pull me back in.

Wednesday, May 6, 2009

Same Ol', Same Ol': Rockies 11, Giants 1

Not much to say about this one. The offense was non-existant, again. The Unit was bad on the road, again. The Giants yo-yoed between .500 and one game over, again. They lost when not scoring first, again (now 2-13, 11-0 when scoring first).

TOMORROW: If history keeps repeating, the Giants will score first tomorrow and win to split the series.

Tuesday, May 5, 2009

Baseball Like It Oughta Be: Giants 6, Cubs 2


Today was good day. I woke up late, watched the Giants beat the Cubs behind Lincecum and two 3-run innings. Bengie Molina got the Giants started in fine fashion, as his 3-run HR in the 1st gave Lincecum 3 runs to play with before he ever took the mound. As soon as the TV cameras showed Lincecum in the dugout, pumping his fist like he'd already won, I thought, "That better be enough, Timmy, because that might be all you get". For a long time, it looked like I was right. Lincecum led by the slim margin of 3-2 after 7 innings before the Giants added 3 in the top of the 8th, highlighted by a 2-run double by the eternally-slumping Aaron Rowand.

Getting to watch the Giants play a day game at Wrigley is one of life's simple pleasures. Getting to see Lincecum hold down the Cubbies for the win is the cherry on top. The Giants scoring 6 runs is the tab of acid on top of the cherry.

Bright spots: Merkin Valdez was nasty, and struck out 2 in an inning of work -- he hit 99 and had a devastating slider. Emmanuel Burriss had 2 hits, albeit from the right side. Molina continues to be a not-as-embarrassing-as-it-should-be cleanup hitter. Rowand (see above).

Downside: After getting hot the last 2 games, Fred Lewis looked very bad at the plate, taking a collar and still hasn't homered. Before looking nasty and striking out 2, Valdez couldn't get the ball over the plate with a 4 run lead in the 8th -- he was lucky to get his first out on what would've been ball 4.

Again, just awesome -- real grass, real sunshine, real baseball. Giants at Wrigley. Lincecum. Runs. Not working. Today represented everything great about America.

TOMORROW: The Giants travel to Colorado to play the Rockies, the Big Unit taking the hill against Ubaldo Jimenez (a.k.a. "Battle of The Uglies 2: Rocky Mountain Ugly").

Monday, May 4, 2009

Insert Title Here: Cubs 4, Giants 2

Didn't see the game. Don't plan to either, though I have it on TiVo. It didn't look like much to see -- Jonathan Sanchez too wild again, offense dominated by Ryan Dempster (who shared a flight with my wife and I to Australia, where we were going to get married in 2004). Ho-hum. Move along. Besides, there's more baseball around the corner: I have the next three days off work -- during which the Giants will play two day games, including tomorrow.

The good news from tonight: Pablo Sandoval is back where he belongs -- hitting .320+ with gap power -- and so is Fred Lewis, who's hitting .312 and taking his fair share of walks. Though I'd love to see him take a couple of trots around the bases before too long, if you catch my drift (Chicago and Colorado aren't bad places to find your power stroke -- hint, hint). Another bright side: The 'pen. The Giants got 2 shutout innings out of both Bob Howry, who's been struggling, and Justin Miller, who'd been surprisingly good.

TOMORROW: An awesome fucking display of baseball -- Tim Lincecum at Wrigley Field in an 11:20 PDT start. God bless America!

Sunday, May 3, 2009

There's no "W" in Zito: Giants 1, Rockies 0


The Giants got great pitching and terrible hitting. This is not a recording. The good news is -- as it has been so often this season -- the offense did just enough to win. Not just the game, but the series -- the Giants 5th straight winning series. Seriously.

The worst part of watching your team struggle mightily to score is that point they reach where it's in their heads, and it seems they can do everything but score. They hit leadoff doubles (as they Giants did twice today in the later innings of a 0-0 game), they get them to third with less than 1 out (once) or even no outs (once), and still can't score. Guys lineout (once), guys hit shots into double plays (once), and guys hold up on balls that get away far eenough for them to score because they're afraid of being the latest guy to blow a rally (twice). Instead they leave it someone else.

When you're winning 5-0 in the 6th, a lineout to 2B with a man on third is a minor annoyance. When it's 0-0, and the guy on the mound is threatening to take shutouts into the 7th three times in a row without a win to show for it (more on that in a moment), that same lineout is a tragedy worthy of an opera. Schierholtz's lineout to 2B with the potential winning run on third and 1 out was bad luck, but the Giants are also making a lot of that lick -- lewis could've scored on a wild pitch earlier in the AB had he tried it.

And the bad luck leads to bad decisions from the manager, too. Witness Bruce Bochy's decision to PH Bengie Molina for Fred Lewis in the 7th. Rather than have the red-hot Lewis -- 3 rockets on the day for 2 hits: 1 to LF, 1 to CF, 1 to RF -- face a LHP, he went with Molina. This, despite the fact a double play would end the inning, and Molina undisputed King Of The DP. Of course, that's what ended up happening, and the Giants wasted a 1st and 3rd, 0 out situation. It was also their last chance to make a winner out of the suddenly hard luck Barry Zito.

Zito must have caught whatever curse Matt Cain had the last couple of years, because he went winless again, despite going 7 innings and allowing 0 runs twice over the last 3 starts. Both games were 0-0 when he left. That's same serious Cainage right there. Of course, the bright side is that he's pitching not just like the non-embarrassing #4 or #5 starter that I hoped he might turn into, but a real live ace. I doubt that will continue, but I'll enjoy it while it does, and keep hoping when he things finally even out, he'll settle into a middle of the solid rotation guy. While the odds are against that, his peripherals from his last two 7 inning, 0 run outings are encouraging -- 5 K's/0 BB's last time, and 4 K's/1 BB this time.

Just like the last time, the Giants came back to win 1-0 in the 10th after Zito was no longer around. Last time, the winning hit came from PH Bengie Molina. This time, it came from PH Rich Aurilia. The hit scored backup C Steve Holm, who walked and advanced to 2nd on a sac bunt by Randy Winn. Holm had a nice day in his first start of the year, notching a hit, walk and sac bunt while catching a 10 inning shutout. Not bad for a guy who was 0 for 18 in AAA before being called up.

TOMORROW: The Giants fly into Chicago for their only trip to Wrigley Field -- just a 2-game series. Jonathan Sanchez will take the hill against Ryan Dempster. Can the friendly confines of Wrigley awaken the Giants slumbering bats? God, I hope so.

Saturday, May 2, 2009

There's no "O" in Giants: Rockies 5, Giants 1

Again, the Giants offense came up small. This reminded me of what my old high school English teacher used to call the Giants: "The Pygmies". That certainly describes the team today, when they came within a Pablo Sandoval HR from being shut out by Giant-killer Jason Marquis (4-1, 1.98 ERA lifetime).

Matt Cain was off his game, allowing 5 runs, but a good offensive team might have taken advantage of the solid relief work and won the game, 7-5 or something. Not this team. At least, not right now. The starting pitching can't be perfect (see today), so they need to step it up a bit to give them a chance. Otherwise, Brian Sabean might see a team one power hitter away from contending and get a not-so-bright idea.

TOMORROW: Zito vs. Jason Hammel. Hammel has a 5.59 ERA and a 1.97 WHIP this year (5.89 and 1.65 career), and yet I still feel like he's the favorite.

Unit-ed: Giants 3, Rockies 2


I'm sensing a trend in Big Unit starts -- dominant at home, bad on the road, dominant at home, bad on the road, dominant at home. This is a little worrisome as half his starts this year will come on thee road, but then again, half will come at home. It's too early to draw major conclusions from these results (especially the two bad starts), but this appears a classic glass half-full/half-empty, good news/bad news situation. Or, more precisely, a Good Unit/Bad Unit situation.

On Friday night, he was definitely the Good Unit. The result was 7 innings, 4 hits, 9 K's and no runs, as the Giants won 3-2. The game was well in hand -- 3-0 Giants -- through 7 innings before the Giants set-up men did their best blow the lead. Struggling righty set-up man Bob Howry allowed a leadoff HR to Chris Ianetta in the 8th, and Jeremy Affedt allowed 3 hits (though 2 were of the cheapie infield variety which a better SS then Renteria would've probably turned into outs) while only getting 2 outs.

Then Bruce Bochy did something he's been doing more and more after avoiding it the last season plus -- bringing in Brian Wilson to get a 4+ out save. In this case, Wilson was up for the task, though he needed the help of Renteria, who did a good job to stop Garrett Atkins' grounder in the hole from going into LF to keep the potential tying run from scoring. That loaded the bases, but the situation wasn't quite tough enough for the adrenaline junkie Wilson. So he ran the count to the next hitter, Ryan Spillbourghs to 3-2 before striking him out on a high fastball. Wilson walked one in the 9th (can't make it too anti-climactic) before striking out Ian Stewart to end it.

Again, the Giants offense did just enough to support the good pitching. Leading the way were Pablo Sandoval, who stayed hot, getting two hits (including an earth-shaking triple), and Travis Ishikawa, who stayed both hot and power-unlucky with two hits, including an RBI double, which would've been a HR in almost any other park. Ishikawa could easily have a couple of HR"s this year, but remains stuck on zero because of the park he plays in.

In fact, Fred Lewis, who's been slumping quite a bit lately, also has zero HR's. That gives the Giants three most impressive (and potential middle of the order) young hitters -- Lewis, Sandoval, and Ishikawa -- with 1 HR total. If this trend continues, I don't think the pitching can keep them afloat, but I'll enjoy it while I can. What I won't enjoy, however, is seeing Emmanuel Burriss continue to flail away at MLB pitching. I was in favor of giving Kevin Frandsen the starting 2B job before the season, and am even more so now. At this rate, it won't be long before those two players swap places -- Burriss to Fresno, Frandsen to The City.

Wednesday, April 29, 2009

April Flowers: Giants 9, Dodgers 4


The Giants April schedule is over, and they end it with a 10-10 record. From where I'm sitting, that's something to build on. They were 2-7, and looking lost. Since then, the starting pitching has been every bit as good as I thought it might -- even better, considering Zito's newfound decentness -- and the everything else has been just good enough to win.

Tonight was more of the same -- Lincecum dominating, the offense contributing more than usual, the bullpen less. The Giants rarely score 9 runs (or get 4 hits from Renteria), but Lincecum pitched well enough to win 4-3. The Giants team which played the Dodgers in this series was a complete turnaround from the one which was swept in LA on a 0-6 road trip. They very well could've swept this series, but for a total fundamental breakdown on Tuesday.

If you believe the starters can keep this up, which is unlikely, then the Giants are in good shape. The hitting will likely improve at least a bit as the year goes on as young players get some experience, and the overworked troika in the bullpen (Wilson, Affeldt, Howry) should get another arm when Sergio Romo comes off the DL soon. With lots of young stars coming up through the minors, the future would look mighty bright.

If the starting pitching falters, however, it could get ugly very quickly. While Giants have lots of good young starters in the minors, the ones at AAA Fresno are not particularly enticing. The hitting will likely improve, but I don't expect it to be much above average if at all. And the D and bullpen aren't good enough to save the day. Barring a major trade, the starters are the keystone the season rests on.

So far, so good.

TOMORROW: Off-day. The Giants are back at it Friday night as they host the Rockies. The Big Unit will take on Ubaldo Jimenez in a battle of historically ugly vs epically ugly.

Memoirs of an Unemployed Man, Part 2: Enter the Crazy Flower Lady


Way back in my unemployed days, I wrote what was to be Part 1 of what was to be a 2 part piece on my job search. I promised Part 2 would come shortly, then warned my word isn't worth shit. I made good on one of those two statements. I had good excuses -- I moved, I got a new job, I polished a couple of scripts -- but I never did follow my with the conclusion. But now, after some gentle prodding from a the regular reader of this blog, I'm finally coming through with the long-awaited Part 2...

In my marathon search for employment, I began looking for any kind of part-time job which could get some cash flowing in. One such job was a flower shop which delivers to Hollywood production companies, restaurants, and clubs. It seemed like a pretty chill gig -- driving around Hollywood, dropping off flowers, setting them up, and watering the ones already there. It was only about 4 or 5 hours a day, which would allow me lots of time to write and hike and watch baseball -- my three food groups.

When they called me back, I was actually kind of excited -- the lady on the other end of the line talked about the A-list Oscar party they'd just worked, and how she didn't like drama. It seemed like a good fit. I made an interview for the next afternoon. It was a bit of a hike out to West LA where the shop was, and upon getting there, I found there was very limited parking. I found a spot in a residential neighborhood a block away, taking note that I'd only be safe there for half-hour.

The woman let me in the door, and handed me an application. I filled it out and was surprised when she handed me another packet to fill out. This was a 50 question personality test. For a job delivering flowers. It had questions like "Which is more important, being right or being fair?" I quickly filled it out, trying hard to not fall to far on either side of the fence. Not too passive, nor too aggressive. Not to selfish, or selfless. Not too prideful, or too insecure.

When I finished, she went through that packet first, clearly eager to find out who I was. She might have accomplished this by actually, you know, talking to me. Instead, she used a key -- a grid printed on a sheet of paper -- to decipher the answers to my "test". She told me I was very zen, but also quite forceful. That I was neither too left, nor too right. I was, basically, right down the middle. She loved this, but what really seemed to clinch the deal was my birth year -- 1971. You see, that is the Year of the Pig on the Chinese calendar, and she was both Chinese and also born in '71, so she understood exactly what this meant. She went on to explain to me how we were a very good match, and how I had "open, honest eyes", and "positive energy". When she explained that it was also nice to have a "hunky guy" delivering her flowers, I started to wonder if this was a job interview or blind date.

It was around this time, I noticed that I only had 5 minutes to move my car before I got a ticket. I mentioned this to her, and she went on a long explanation of how parking was tough in the area, and how I'd have to park 3 blocks away and walk over some train tracks and a field to get to work everyday. When I had only 2 minutes, I reminded her again about my car. Just a moment, she promised, saying she was printing me out directions on how to park. It appeared I was hired, so the last thing I was going to do was walk out on her at that point, but she just kept talking and talking -- about the job, LA, life in general, spirituality, religion, everything.

Finally, she told me to come in at 8:30 the next morning, and let me go. It was 30 minutes past when I had to move, but I still jogged all the way (in dress shoes), hoping to avoid a ticket. But I got there to find one sure enough -- for 58 bucks. I was pissed, but calmed myself a bit by thinking about how I'd just landed a job. In hindsight, it should've been a sign.

The next day, I made sure to be up and out of the house early, making sure not to be late due to LA traffic. I also had to allow extra time for the walk from my car. Because of this, I was quite early. I killed a little time in my car, reading a magazine, but still got to the store about 15 minutes early. I thought this might be a good sign to my new employer that I was responsible, prepared, and on the ball. Instead, I got yelled at. "You're early", she said "Try not to do that. Now you've got me off my schedule." Of course, what throws someone off their schedule more than an employee arriving a little early to work?

Before long, she was showing me all the ropes of the job -- and expecting me to pick it up on the fly. That's okay, I like a challenge. Before long, the company van was all loaded up -- to her extremely detailed and very high standards -- and we were ready to leave. I got in the driver's seat, her riding shotgun, and left. We were 10 feet out of the parking spot before she began to criticize.

The breaks on the van were brand new, and I had never driven it, so the initial trip down the alley behind the store was a little herky-jerky. "These breaks are tight", I said, explaining. "No, they aren't -- they're perfect", she retorted. "I just had them replaced." I tried to be diplomatic: "New breaks are always tight -- that's good, I just have to get used to them." Before I could finish, she yelled at me that I wasn't paying enough attention to the "very dangerous" blind corner we were approaching. I shut up and navigated it, and were on our way to our first stop. Before getting there, she criticized my speed ("This van is harder to stop than you think"), my lane choice ("Most accidents happen in the left lanes, I try to stay right"), and my stopping ("You should stop at least 15 or 20 feet behind the car in front of you -- that way, if we're rear-ended, we won't hit the car in front of us"). "Oh dear", I thought to myself. "This will not end well", I'd think to myself.

But this constant harping was punctuated by what appeared to be her fawning over my every comment or joke. She'd compliment my looks, or my personality, I'd play it off with a casual line, and she'd giggle ("You're such a Piggy", she'd say, delighted -- apparently meaning such a typical person born in the Year of the Pig"). When I told her something about my life, a certain unlikely turn of events, she she'd virtually squeal: "Piggy luck! Piggy luck!" I mentioned she was crazy, right?

The first stop was uneventful, but on our way to the second, I could tell that wouldn't repeat itself. She began to get very nervous and talkative about the next job -- delivering and watering orchids for a big production company in town called Relativity. She said they were her biggest clients, and we must slip in and do our work silently -- invisibly -- so as not to disturb these artistic geniuses. I could tell by now this lady had serious issues with stress, and it was starting rub off: I was already imagining who from the entertainment world I might run into at Relativity, and how embarrassing it might be. My conclusion was that the most embarrassing run-in would be with the managers I just fired, second would be the producers who bought my pitch a couple of years earlier.

By the time we arrived at Relativity and lugged all our supplies upstairs, it was pretty hot, and I was sweating. This was just one of the problems she noticed once we were inside -- I was sweating too much, not working fast enough, making too much noise, etc. In the beginning, she was walking me through everything, explaining how to do the job, but at some point she just told me to go do things -- never explain how they should be done. Then she criticized how I did them, as if she had explained it to me before -- she hadn't.

Just when I thought it couldn't get any worse, who do I see? The producers who bought my script in the lobby, waiting for a meeting. At first, I thought it was my imagination -- it couldn't really be them. But it was. Luckily, they were both so involved with their Blackberrys they didn't seem to notice me. I did my work, and avoided them. But when she came to check on my work, something awful happened -- she recognized one of them. They had worked together at Warner Bros. a few years earlier, and struck up a conversation. I was -- painfully -- just a few feet away, but I kept my head down, made myself look busy, and tried to stay under the radar. Because I only met this producer in person once (when we pitched), and had 90% of our contact over phone and e-mail, I don't think he recognized me, but it was embarrassing nonetheless.

Mercifully, he was called into his meeting shortly thereafter, and we got back to finishing our work. But it wasn't that merciful -- she complained we were taking too long to finish there because of me not working fast enough (her 10 minute conversation with the producer while she could've been showing me what to do and helping out apparently had nothing to do with this fact). As we finished, she seemed increasingly annoyed by the fact, I didn't know how much to water orchids (keep in mind, I'd never done it before, and never claimed to have). She ordered me to water one, then stared daggers at me while I did.

"Am I doing it wrong?" I asked. No answer -- just more daggers. The fact this evil face staring back at me belonged to the same lady who was fawning over just moments earlier made it even more off-putting. "I must not be doing it wrong, but I have no idea," I continued, "because you're just giving me that look of death." Still no answer, just a very angry and frustrated sigh and shake of the head. Now, I know this isn't going to work out, so why not be honest? "Look, this clearly isn't as good a fit as you thought it would be", I said. "So just tell me how to do it, so we can get out of here. I'll finish out the day, and you'll never have to see me again." This seemed to draw her out of her shell a bit. She showed me how to finish up, we silently gathered our things, and loaded them into the van.

Once inside the van, she wanted to open up and talk. "So, what do you think?" she asked. "I think I'm not as good as you need me to be, and you're not as patient as I need you to be. It's not a good fit. I think we finish out the day, and then go our separate ways." She loved this. Loved it. Complemented by honesty, praised my communication skills, even laughed at my earlier "Look of death" comment. Several times. She kept saying it over and over, laughing each time. As we continued on for the rest of the day, she was much more open and helpful, and continually talking about how good a fit we were. Seriously.

At the end of the day, she talked about the next day's schedule. I still had this job. The question was: Did I still want it? The answer: In this economy, yes. There was no talk of our problems, and it seemed she'd moved on. So I showed up for work the next day -- more than a little nervous about what direction this would go. I made sure to arrive right on time -- not a minute early -- but she claimed I was a minute or two late. I should've just left right then. We packed up the van, and I pulled out, making sure not to hit the brakes too hard. I turned the opposite way down the alley to avoid the dangerous blind corner -- she said that was a no-no because the bumpy alley the other way was worse. Here we go again.

The trip to Hollywood was much smoother this time -- I made sure to stay right, stop 20 feet behind cars, etc., etc. -- and she spent the entire time opening up to me about her life as if I was her shrink. She talked about how much she hated the superficiality of plastic surgery, then explained how she had her teeth whitened and got regular botox implants. She talked about how hard-working "her people" were, while "Mexicans in LA are all so angry". It was an eye-opening experience. Still, it was better than being yelled at. It wouldn't last long.

The first stop was at Eva Longoria's restaurant on Hollywood Boulevard, where the criticism and dagger-shooting began again. Again, she didn't give me the necessary details for how to do the job, then went crazy when I didn't know them, or accomplish them quickly. I wasn't alone -- she also laid into a bartender who wasn't doing anything wrong either. The main point of contention -- at least for me -- was the fact she was constantly telling me how to count, as if not understanding that was the key to my slowness. Every time there was an issue, she'd explain to me how to count quickly. It was really annoying.

Finally, she said, "We're late, we have to go." I explained there were still two things on her checklist we had to do. "We don't have time", she said. While she was clearly emotional, I was matter of fact: "Then which should I not do." Again, no answer -- just daggers.

The situation finally reached its boiling point at the next place, where she again tried to explain how you count. "That's it", I said. "You can stop with the training. This will be my last day." "Why?" she asked. Are you kidding me? I explained why she was so hard to work with, how she criticized, and went from one extreme to the other. Mostly, I explained that an angry glare doesn't convey any helpful information. I told her she was the hardest person to work with I'd ever met, and that I'd finish the day if she liked, but would much prefer walking away right then.

She was legitimately shocked, and asked how I would get back to my car. I said it didn't matter -- that I would be so happy to not have to work for her anymore, I'd be willing to walk home and call a cab. She appeared hurt, but offered to cut me a check right then for my services and would allow me to go. I took it, threw off the company polo shirt I was wearing, and walked home -- about 12 blocks. Later that night, I had my wife drive me over to West La to pick up my car. Even in this economy, you have to draw the line somewhere.

As I've said since, it all ended up working out for the best -- I have a better job, in a better location, working for a better boss, and earning more money. You know what I call that? Piggy luck!

Tuesday, April 28, 2009

Not Ready For Prime Time: Dodgers 5, Giants 3

The Giants had enough talent to win tonight. They went up against a pitcher who's owned them and hit his well enough to win. And their own starter, Jonathan Sanchez pitched well enough to win. But none of those things happened, of course. And the impediment to their success was themselves.

On offense, baserunning mistakes and that old favorite (you guessed it) poor situational hitting cost them several runs. On D, fielding errors cost them a couple of runs and forced Sanchez to throw extra pitches which lead to him leaving the game after just 5 innings. Oh, and they walked nine hitters. Despite those gaffes, they still almost won the game. But they're not quite good enough to make this many mistakes and still beat a good team.

The Dodgers had something to do with this result as well. Rafael Furcal used his great arm to gun down Randy Winn in the 1st inning on a play when it looked like he'd score easily. Then the threat of Furcal's arm caused 3rd base coach Tim Flannery to hold up Travis Ishikawa on a play he probably could've scored on. Finally, Ishikawa compounded the error by getting doubled off 3rd on a lineout by Emmanuel Burris.

Juan Uribe had a particularly shitty game, making a big error, and failing to knock in a run, despite batting with 8 men on in 3 AB's with a total of 3 outs (1st and 2nd with 0 outs, bases loaded with 2 outs, bases loaded with 1 out). Bobby Howry lost it in the 9th, but by then, the Giants sloppy play had already all but sealed their fate.

TOMORROW: Tim Lincecum tries to win the rubber game of the Dodger series, thus striking a devastating blow to the heart of pure evil.

Rebound: Giants 5, Dodgers 4

The Giants bounced back from a crushing loss to beat the hated Dodgers Monday night. That would be a nice win any day. But when you consider the Giants got a great start out of Barry Zito, only to blow a 3-0 7th inning lead in the blink of an eye, and trailed before coming back to win, it makes it all the sweeter. Add to that, Brian Wilson's dominance (1-2-3 9th, all K's) after his nightmare 9th inning Sunday, and Twitter controversy", and you've really got some drama and intrigue.

The Giants could be on a 7 game win streak if not for one bad inning at the worst possible time, but it's hard to be too disappointed with a win against LA and a hard-fought .500 record. Not to mention surviving a tired bullpen only arms -- the little-used Merkin Valdez was the other. I don't even mind that Valdez struggled and vultured the win from Zito. In fact, that kind of makes me happy.

TOMORROW: Jonathan Sanchez takes on Giant-killer Chad Billingsley.

Monday, April 27, 2009

Heartbreak: D-Back 5, Giants 4

This was the worst loss of the year, as the Giants turned a 4-1 9th inning lead into a 5-4 12 inning loss. How disappointing was it? Let me count the ways:

1) A win would've given the Giants a rare road sweep -- one inside the division, no less -- after starting out 0-3 on the road.

2) It would've raised their record above .500 to 9-8. Instead, they drop back below to 8-9.

3) Hard-luck Matt Cain would've gone to 3-0, but again bad hitting and relief costs him a win. He still stands at 2-0.

4) Their winning streak would've run to 6, but is instead stopped at 5.

5) All momentum seems gone as they jet back home to face the 1st place Dodgers. And because of Brian Wilson's blown save, and the game being extended into the 12th inning, the bullpen has been over-used and abused heading in.

That, and it happened on a Sunday, while I was enjoying the game live. If that's not enough, Justin Upton hit his game-tying HR just as I realized a computer crash had cost me three hours of work. L-A-M-E.

TOMORROW: Giants/Dodgers at China Basin. If that pumps you up, I have the perfect cure. Barry Zito is pitching.

Saturday, April 25, 2009

.500 And Loving It: Giants 5, D-Backs 3


The streak of great performances by the Giants starters is over, but the Giants ability to do just enough to win continued. Of course, it was the D-Backs, so I'm not sure just what that really means yet, but a win is a win. And when you take 6 of 7, you don't ask questions. You just keep smiling. And when a win gets you back to .500, that goes double.

The Unit was malfunctioning tonight, unable to throw strikes consistently, walking 7, and getting yanked in the 4th inning. It being his first start back in Arizona, I'm willing to cut him a little slack, but his ERA is 6.16 after 4 starts, and one of those a 1-hitter for 7 innings. Johnson was able to hold the damage to a minimum -- 2 runs -- and keep the Giants in the game. This allowed the Giants to storm back with 4 runs in the 5th to take the lead. The big blows were a 2-out 2-run double by Renteria after a great AB, and a HR by the very next batter, Randy Winn.

Though they tacked on another run later, that was all the Giants would need. Justin Miller allowed a run in his 1.2 innings, but Jonathan Sanchez, Bob Howry, Jeremy Affeldt, and Brian Wilson are held Arizona scoreless. The pen has been mighty for some time now -- especially the Affeldt, Howry, Wilson troika -- but it's been overshadowed by an even more impressive rotation.

TOMORROW: The Giants go for the rare road sweep behind Matt Cain, who will attempt to raise his record to 3-0. John Garland will start for the D-Backs.

Friday, April 24, 2009

In The Zone: Giants 5, D-Backs 1


Again, this was how Brian Sabean drew it up before the season -- great starting pitching, decent enough hitting, and solid defense. The defense and the hitting haven't been very dependable this year, but the pitching is starting to look like something the team can count on.

Counting on opposite-field HR's by Edgar Renteria, and getting 12 K's from your starter is not something they can do on most nights, but when Lincecum pitches it's certainly not surprising. Unfortunately, it's also not suprising to see the Giants leave runners at 3rd with less than 2 out again and again. Tonight, Aaron Rowand did it twice himself, and he wasn't alone. But when Lincecum is on, it doesn't matter much, as long as you score him a couple.

Rowand helped him off to a good start with a fabulous play to save a run in the 1st inning, cutting off a Stephen Drew double into the gap with a quick slide, then popping up and, in one motion, hitting the cutoff man with a strong throw. Lincecum then struck out Mark Reynolds to keep him there, and got out of the inning unscathed, going 8 innings and allowing only a single run and walk to go with the dozen K's (he struck out 13 D-Backs in SF less than a week ago).

The Giants managed to score 5 runs despite their lack of good situational hitting, mainly because of Bengie Molina, who hit one HR with the bases empty, and one ringing double with the bases full, driving in 3 runs total. He may not be the ideal cleanup hitter, but he's our cleanup hitter, dammit. Other highlights included Pablo Sandoval's 2 hits and a walk (yes, you read that right), and Fred Lewis chipping in 2 more hits to raise his average to .360.

For six straight games, the Giants have had dominant starting pitching -- not just in terms of results, but also peripherals -- and have won 5 of those 6 games. Lincecum has been the poster boy of the rotation, and for good reason, but it's nice to see all 5 guys contributing so well at once. It's gotten so good that the team can skip Jonathan Sanchez after a great start and not skip a beat., there might have been some controversy over choosing him and not Zito, but not when The Albatross goes out and mows down a division rival in a 1-0 extra inning win. It's too early to take these types of numbers too seriously, but there's no reason we shouldn't enjoy it.

Wednesday, April 22, 2009

Real Sunshine, Real Grass, Real Baseball: Giants 1, Padres 0


It was great to see a giants game live today, great to see a businessman's special -- my favorite games -- and great to see Barry Zito pitch like something more than a shadow of his former self. He was far better than that -- throwing 7 shutout innings, striking out 5 and walking none. it was the second straight game in which a Giants starter with control issues had 5 K's with no walks, and the 5th straight game a Giants starter pitched very well.

Luckily for the Giants, they avoided dropping a second of those five by being shutout when they scored the game's lone run with 2 outs in the bottom on the 10th. As Jon Miller said on the postgame show, right now the best way to describe the Giants is "If they score, they win".

It seems I was wrong on my prediction of Schierholtz getting his first start, but I was close: Andres Torres got his first start instead, and scored the winning (and only) run. I would've gone with Nate, who is now the only Giants position player yet to start a game, but Bochy's hunch paid off.

Hell, he even put Pablo Sandoval in catching gear for the first time today, and gave Bengie Molina the day off (the day after Steve Holm was brought up to provide a real backup catcher -- I'm sure if that timing makes sense or not), and had both players play major roles in their victory. Sandoval caught a 10 inning shutout and made a couple of nice plays (and one bad throw as well). Molina came off the bench to win the game with a double, scoring Torres, who had singled and stolen second.

Torres showed today how much better he is than Eugenio Velez -- he made a great defensive play, helped with the bat, and looked fantastic on the bases. Meanwhile, Velez has shown to be a terrible defender and baserunner (despite his great speed). In the 10th alone, the difference between them was clear. After Torres got himself in scoring position, Velez had a chance to play the hero, and struck out. Worse, than that, he realize it. After swinging and missing at strike three, he waited around at home plate as if he thought he got four strikes. The ump had to tell him to go away, holding out three fingers as if to say, "Can't you count to three, moron?" Because Velez still has options, I wouldn't be surprised to see him return to AAA.

TOMORROW: Off-day.